We were told to read an article about physics and how it proved that Santa Claus couldn't exist. He provided good evidence such as extracting 15% of children in the world due to different religious children. Another good reason was that he said that the presents and Santa Claus's weight together would take thousands of reindeers to carry. He also mentioned how they couldn't travel faster than the speed of light, and if they did, they would just burn. There were even more reasons that didn't have enough evidence. But, what valid points did the counter-arguments bring up?
The articles that contained counter-arguments had some very valid reasons. One good reason was to explain that there definitely is a possibility, although not big, that we have yet to discover a species of flying deer. Another good reason was that if you traveled at the speed of light, time runs backwards. He also stated that there was more of a percentage of misbehaving children (possibly 20-25%). I have to side with the people who say that Santa Clause is real. Not because I really DO believe in Santa, (which I do not) but I do believe there is a bigger possibility that he does exist than we think. The side stating that Santa Claus does not exists made too many assumptions and did not provide as much evidence as the counter-arguers did. Therefore, I believe that the people who say there is a possibility that Santa Claus is real deserve more credit.
The articles that contained counter-arguments had some very valid reasons. One good reason was to explain that there definitely is a possibility, although not big, that we have yet to discover a species of flying deer. Another good reason was that if you traveled at the speed of light, time runs backwards. He also stated that there was more of a percentage of misbehaving children (possibly 20-25%). I have to side with the people who say that Santa Clause is real. Not because I really DO believe in Santa, (which I do not) but I do believe there is a bigger possibility that he does exist than we think. The side stating that Santa Claus does not exists made too many assumptions and did not provide as much evidence as the counter-arguers did. Therefore, I believe that the people who say there is a possibility that Santa Claus is real deserve more credit.
RSS Feed